With respect to measurement out-of intimate envy, in the forty thinking-report tool was in fact reported due to the fact creation of this new Worry about-Declaration and you may Projective Envy Balances (Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979). Of numerous tool were utilized only once. , 1992) designed to assess gender differences; the brand new Multidimensional Jealousy Level (Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989) built to gauge the three dimensions of jealousy (cognitive, emotional and you may behavioral dimensions); the fresh Myspace Jealousy Level (Muise, Christofides, & Des) aimed at evaluating the possibilities of a meeting that creates emotions of envy participants regarding their craft to the Fb; the fresh new Envy Measure (Buunk, 1997), accustomed examine about three particular envy (activated, nervous and you will preventive) and also the Interpersonal Jealousy Measure (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981), hence evaluates the latest negative emotion as a consequence of real otherwise threatened loss of a loved person to a rival.
Into the Brazil, the fresh Intimate Envy Catalog are revised (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) As for Colombia, there are not any psychometric education away from a particular size to your intimate envy
On the Latin american context, there’s an adaptation into the Chile of one’s List off Behaviors of the Partners That can cause Envy (Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014). From inside the Mexico, an excellent Multidimensional Way of measuring Jealousy (Diaz-Loving, Rivera, & Flores, 1989) could have been elaborated and a preliminary data are done with the Multidimensional Catalog away from Personal Envy (Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016). As well, early in the day knowledge did not carry out Factorial Confirmatory Data (CFA) so as to corroborate brand new basis structure located, and you can reduced accuracy profile were included in its activities (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) otherwise brief products were used (Mota et al., 2016).
This new IJS created to possess Mathes and you can Severa (1981) the most made use of scales to own contrasting close envy, it discover half a dozen circumstances you to measure the sensitiveness to help you threats relevant to: (a) Partner’s infidelity and you may relationships someone else (issues step 1, step three, several, 14, 15, 16, 20, twenty-two, 23, and you can 25); (b) Lover’s dominance (points dos, step 3, cuatro, seven, ten, 13, 17, 20, and you can 23); (c) An untrustworthy lover (facts 1, cuatro, six, 19, and you can 21); (d) Partner’s dated dates (points 11, twenty four the escort, twenty six, 27, and twenty-eight); (e) Partner’s apathy (affairs 8, 9 and you can twenty-four); and you will (f) Partner’s left family members that have old times and you will intercourse differences (facts 5 and you may 18).
All of the tools mentioned above show enough quantities of legitimacy and you can reliability
There are four studies that have looked at in terms of its reliability and you can authenticity. Mathes and you can Severa (1981) expose a couple studies, plus the very first data performed the construction of your own level which have 39 products, which had been reduced to twenty eight items immediately following statistical data. Next, from inside the one minute study, IJS was utilized next to almost every other bills one examined personal like-backlinks, low self-esteem, self-admiration and you can a random questionnaire out-of independent identities, verifying, predicated on concept, that the excellent from jealousy, the higher the amount of Romantic love together with decreased the latest independent title of your few. Inside investigation, i declaration an excellent coefficient away from accuracy off .ninety-five into the full scale. In a 3rd research, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and Penis (1982), so you can stretch the evidence away from legitimacy, used the IJS and two behavioural actions: (a) chances whenever confronted with a competitor and (b) phrases out of possessiveness into mate, because of a call that they designed to the one who took part in the research. New questioned correlations were gotten, which once more served the fresh new legitimacy of the scale. In the end, inside a 4th data, Mathes, Roter and you may Joerger (1982) corroborated the brand new convergent validity out-of IJS together with other balances one examined personal jealousy.